[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aJ7wWDejA0KDarIE@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 10:31:20 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...aweiss.eu>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] i2c: qcom-cci: Add msm8953 compatible
Hi Luca,
> I'm also not sure what these parameters depend on, if it's CCI HW version,
> or
> something else. So naming it after the SoC should be a safer bet. Also the
> msm8974-cci was only named 'v1.5' because it's an inbetween mix of the v1
> and
> v2 that were already upstream so arguably that one shouldn't have been
> called
> v1.5 in the first place either.
>
> Let me know what you think. Maybe also someone from Qualcomm/Linaro can jump
> in and share their thoughts, if someone knows more what these params depend
> on.
Thanks for the heads up. I agree that it needs someone from Qualcomm for
definite answers. But if nobody chimes in, your patch is good as is from
my side.
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Thanks,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists