[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd043822-29b2-49f4-864d-6658741f572c@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:44:17 +0800
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, tj@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
mkoutny@...e.com, longman@...hat.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lujialin4@...wei.com, chenridong@...wei.com,
christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr
Subject: Re: [-next v2 3/4] cpuset: separate tmpmasks and cpuset allocation
logic
On 2025/8/14 5:28, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on tj-cgroup/for-next]
> [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.17-rc1 next-20250813]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Ridong/cpuset-remove-redundant-CS_ONLINE-flag/20250813-164651
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-next
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250813082904.1091651-4-chenridong%40huaweicloud.com
> patch subject: [-next v2 3/4] cpuset: separate tmpmasks and cpuset allocation logic
> config: x86_64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250814/202508140524.S2O4D57k-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250814/202508140524.S2O4D57k-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508140524.S2O4D57k-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> Warning: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:422 function parameter 'pmasks' not described in 'alloc_cpumasks'
>
Hi all,
Thank you for the warning about the comment issue - I will fix it in the next version.
I will be appreciate if you can review this patch. If you have any feedback, I can update the entire
series together.
--
Best regards,
Ridong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists