lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKBDXMe1y16V40Va@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:37:48 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] padata: Reset next CPU when reorder sequence wraps around

On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 02:23:57PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> When seq_nr wraps around, the next reorder job with seq 0 is hashed to
> the first CPU in padata_do_serial(). Correspondingly, need reset pd->cpu
> to the first one when pd->processed wraps around. Otherwise, if the
> number of used CPUs is not a power of 2, padata_find_next() will be
> checking a wrong list, hence deadlock.
> 
> Fixes: 6fc4dbcf0276 ("padata: Replace delayed timer with immediate workqueue in padata_reorder")
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>
> ---
>  kernel/padata.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/padata.c b/kernel/padata.c
> index 7eee94166357..ebb52c6db637 100644
> --- a/kernel/padata.c
> +++ b/kernel/padata.c
> @@ -290,7 +290,11 @@ static struct padata_priv *padata_find_next(struct parallel_data *pd,
>  	if (remove_object) {
>  		list_del_init(&padata->list);
>  		++pd->processed;
> -		pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu);
> +		/* When sequence wraps around, reset to the first CPU. */
> +		if (unlikely(pd->processed == 0))
> +			pd->cpu = cpumask_first(pd->cpumask.pcpu);
> +		else
> +			pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu);

This patch does not apply to the current mainline kernel.

Please check whether it is still needed.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ