lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f6feb92-0496-416b-bf0c-4391e0d4426d@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 08:33:55 +0800
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@...e.com>, tj@...nel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lujialin4@...wei.com, chenridong@...wei.com,
 gaoyingjie@...ontech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] cgroup: remove offline draining in root
 destruction to avoid hung_tasks



On 2025/8/15 19:54, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:28:53 +0800 Chen Ridong wrote:
>>
>> To clarify, when you mentioned "cut max_active off", did you mean setting max_active of
>> cgroup_destroy_wq to 1?
>>
> 	cgroup_destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgroup_destroy", 0, 0);

Thank you for the additional clarification.

While this modification is functional, I’m concerned it might spawn a significant number of cgroup
destruction tasks—most of which would contend for cgroup_mutex. Could this waste system resources?

-- 
Best regards,
Ridong


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ