[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250816143129.u2rdwpwvfhsdptvx@master>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:31:29 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, shuah@...nel.org, pfalcato@...e.de,
david@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
npache@...hat.com, ryan.roberts@....com, dev.jain@....com,
baohua@...nel.org, richard.weiyang@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
donettom@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] mm/selftests: Fix split_huge_page_test failure on
systems with 64KB page size
On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 09:31:10AM +0530, Aboorva Devarajan wrote:
>From: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>
>
>The split_huge_page_test fails on systems with a 64KB base page size.
>This is because the order of a 2MB huge page is different:
>
>On 64KB systems, the order is 5.
>
>On 4KB systems, it's 9.
>
>The test currently assumes a maximum huge page order of 9, which is only
>valid for 4KB base page systems. On systems with 64KB pages, attempting
>to split huge pages beyond their actual order (5) causes the test to fail.
>
>In this patch, we calculate the huge page order based on the system's base
>page size. With this change, the tests now run successfully on both 64KB
>and 4KB page size systems.
>
>Fixes: fa6c02315f745 ("mm: huge_memory: a new debugfs interface for splitting THP tests")
>Co-developed-by: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com>
>Signed-off-by: Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com>
>Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
>Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Nit below:
>---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c | 5 -----
> .../selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c | 22 ++++++++++++-------
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-wp-mremap.c | 5 -----
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h | 5 +++++
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>index 90ee5779662f..e742d9313798 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/cow.c
>@@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ static size_t hugetlbsizes[10];
> static int gup_fd;
> static bool has_huge_zeropage;
>
>-static int sz2ord(size_t size)
>-{
>- return __builtin_ctzll(size / pagesize);
>-}
>-
> static int detect_thp_sizes(size_t sizes[], int max)
> {
> int count = 0;
>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>index eadbeb820d71..7cbeaebc9d71 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>@@ -523,6 +523,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> const char *fs_loc;
> bool created_tmp;
> int offset;
>+ unsigned int max_order;
>+ unsigned int nr_pages;
>+ unsigned int tests;
>
> ksft_print_header();
>
>@@ -534,35 +537,38 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> if (argc > 1)
> optional_xfs_path = argv[1];
>
>- ksft_set_plan(1+8+1+9+9+8*4+2);
>-
> pagesize = getpagesize();
> pageshift = ffs(pagesize) - 1;
> pmd_pagesize = read_pmd_pagesize();
> if (!pmd_pagesize)
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("Reading PMD pagesize failed\n");
>
>+ nr_pages = pmd_pagesize / pagesize;
>+ max_order = sz2ord(pmd_pagesize);
^
extra space here
>+ tests = 2 + (max_order - 1) + (2 * max_order) + (max_order - 1) * 4 + 2;
>+ ksft_set_plan(tests);
>+
> fd_size = 2 * pmd_pagesize;
>
> split_pmd_zero_pages();
>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists