linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] SLUB percpu sheaves

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22666e86-2523-4136-94e6-0de126fcec1e@suse.cz>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 20:33:47 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Sudarsan Mahendran <sudarsanm@...gle.com>,
 Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Cc: Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, cl@...two.org, howlett@...il.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
 roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, surenb@...gle.com, urezki@...il.com,
 Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] SLUB percpu sheaves

On 8/16/25 8:31 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>> I assume somehow the free_to_pcs_bulk() fallback case is taken, thus
>> calling __kmem_cache_free_bulk(), which calls free_to_pcs_bulk() ad nauseam.
> Could it be a rebase gone wrong? Mine to 6.17-rc1 is here (but untested)
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/

This branch specifically
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=b4/slub-percpu-sheaves