[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f93c26c6-c390-46d4-bdd1-4d2f0e03e63d@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 15:21:44 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: gpio: add documentation about using
software nodes
On 8/16/25 3:08 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a few more nits...
>
>
> On 8/15/25 10:30 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> Introduce documentation regarding use of software nodes to describe
>> GPIOs on legacy boards that have not been converted to device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>> ---
>>
>> v2: Addressed Randy's comments.
>>
>> Documentation/driver-api/gpio/board.rst | 65 ++++
>> Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst | 1 +
>> .../driver-api/gpio/legacy-boards.rst | 298 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 364 insertions(+)
>>
> Overall, this looks good. Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
I also tested the docs build and it looks good.
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists