linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/23] net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: Add support for MaxLinear GSW1xx switch family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af253f4d-b63c-4a05-bd87-f5bd47f3f8e2@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:43:27 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Schirm <andreas.schirm@...mens.com>,
	Lukas Stockmann <lukas.stockmann@...mens.com>,
	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>,
	Peter Christen <peter.christen@...mens.com>,
	Avinash Jayaraman <ajayaraman@...linear.com>,
	Bing tao Xu <bxu@...linear.com>, Liang Xu <lxu@...linear.com>,
	Juraj Povazanec <jpovazanec@...linear.com>,
	"Fanni (Fang-Yi) Chan" <fchan@...linear.com>,
	"Benny (Ying-Tsan) Weng" <yweng@...linear.com>,
	"Livia M. Rosu" <lrosu@...linear.com>,
	John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/23] net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: Add support
 for MaxLinear GSW1xx switch family

> This is submitted as RFC to gather feedback on the approach, particularly
> regarding the prefered order of things, ie. should I first introduce all
> features (some are already supported on GRX3xx), then split into MDIO and
> common parts, then add new hardware like I did now, or rather first split
> into MDIO and common parts, then add new hardware support and then new
> features would follow (maybe even in follow series)?

I think the first 8 patches can be merged as a series. You can see
these are preparation for new features, but don't actually add any new
features, so make a reasonable set. 23 patches is too many for one
set.

I have not looked at the remaining patches.

	Andrew