linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] kselftest/arm64: Remove extra blank line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250817052552.8953-2-vivekyadav1207731111@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 22:25:50 -0700
From: vivekyadav1207731111@...il.com
To: catalin.marinas@....com,
	will@...nel.org,
	shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] kselftest/arm64: Remove extra blank line

From: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@...il.com>

Remove an unnecessary blank line to improve code style consistency.

```
[command]
        ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f <path/to/file>

[output]
        CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
	CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary before a close brace '}'
```

Signed-off-by: Vivek Yadav <vivekyadav1207731111@...il.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c       | 1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/assembler.h   | 1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c    | 1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c   | 1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-ptrace.c    | 1 -
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c | 1 -
 6 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c
index 002ec38a8bbb..27d4790c2f0c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c
@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ static void cmpbr_sigill(void)
 	/* Not implemented, too complicated and unreliable anyway */
 }
 
-
 static void crc32_sigill(void)
 {
 	/* CRC32W W0, W0, W1 */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/assembler.h b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/assembler.h
index 04e7b72880ef..141cdcbf0b8f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/assembler.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/assembler.h
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #define GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI	(1U << 0)
 #define GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_PAC	(1U << 1)
 
-
 .macro startfn name:req
 	.globl \name
 \name:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c
index 124bc883365e..3dc195f977ba 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c
@@ -1569,7 +1569,6 @@ static void run_sve_tests(void)
 					  &test_config);
 		}
 	}
-
 }
 
 static void run_sme_tests(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
index ea9c7d47790f..2d75d342eeb9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
@@ -690,7 +690,6 @@ static inline void smstop(void)
 	asm volatile("msr S0_3_C4_C6_3, xzr");
 }
 
-
 /*
  * Verify we can change the SVE vector length while SME is active and
  * continue to use SME afterwards.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-ptrace.c
index 584b8d59b7ea..a7f34040fbf1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-ptrace.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-ptrace.c
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static int get_zt(pid_t pid, char zt[ZT_SIG_REG_BYTES])
 	return ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, pid, NT_ARM_ZT, &iov);
 }
 
-
 static int set_zt(pid_t pid, const char zt[ZT_SIG_REG_BYTES])
 {
 	struct iovec iov;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c
index 989f75a491b7..1e6abb136ffd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/gcs-locking.c
@@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ TEST_F(valid_modes, lock_enable_disable_others)
 	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
 	ASSERT_EQ(mode, PR_SHADOW_STACK_ALL_MODES);
 
-
 	ret = my_syscall2(__NR_prctl, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS,
 			  variant->mode);
 	ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
-- 
2.25.1