linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] riscv: dts: eswin: Add clock driver support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0ef61f03-0346-491d-ad2a-293e24cbc4a8@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 08:07:39 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: dongxuyang@...incomputing.com, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
 aou@...s.berkeley.edu, alex@...ti.fr, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: ningyu@...incomputing.com, linmin@...incomputing.com,
 huangyifeng@...incomputing.com, pinkesh.vaghela@...fochips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] riscv: dts: eswin: Add clock driver support

On 15/08/2025 11:37, dongxuyang@...incomputing.com wrote:
> From: Xuyang Dong <dongxuyang@...incomputing.com>
> 
> Add clock device tree support for eic7700 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Huang <huangyifeng@...incomputing.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xuyang Dong <dongxuyang@...incomputing.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/eswin/eic7700-clocks.dtsi | 2283 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 2283 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/eswin/eic7700-clocks.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/eswin/eic7700-clocks.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/eswin/eic7700-clocks.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..405d06f9190e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/eswin/eic7700-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,2283 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2025, Beijing ESWIN Computing Technology Co., Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +/ {
> +	clock-controller@...28000 {
> +		compatible = "eswin,eic7700-clock";
> +		reg = <0x000000 0x51828000 0x000000 0x80000>;
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +		/* fixed clock */
> +		fixed_rate_clk_apll_fout2: fixed-rate-apll-fout2 {

Such pattern was years ago NAKed.

No, don't ever bring nodes per clock.


Best regards,
Krzysztof