[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <259e72c0-b69a-42d4-aec5-ad8a6e03d416@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:51:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...lbox.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...electronics.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: stm32: Drop redundant status=okay
On 18/08/2025 16:45, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 8/18/25 4:37 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Device nodes are enabled by default, so remove confusing or duplicated
>> enabling of few nodes. No practical impact, verified with dtx_diff.
> I assume the "no practical impact" means DTs are identical before/after
> this patch ? If yes,
No, DTS cannot be identical in this case because one had status, new one
does not have. Practical impact means... visible impact in practice. How
to say it more clearly?
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...lbox.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists