lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250818145646.GGaKM_Ltrggbwkj2TB@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:56:46 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
	x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/34] ASoC: Intel: avs: Include CPUID header at file
 scope

On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 09:01:55AM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Commit
> 
>     cbe37a4d2b3c ("ASoC: Intel: avs: Configure basefw on TGL-based platforms")
> 
> includes the main CPUID header from within a C function.  This works by
> luck and forbids valid refactorings inside the CPUID header.
> 
> Include the CPUID header at file scope instead.
> 
> Note, for the CPUID(0x15) leaf number, use CPUID_LEAF_TSC instead of
> defining a custom local macro for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@...utronix.de>
> Acked-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/intel/avs/tgl.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

I'm guessing that:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/aGv8AWwHbi5seDxi@lx-t490

still needs to happen yet?

Because I don't see it in this set...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ