[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DC5N439ZNA6E.34LSQ3K5366P7@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:57:37 +0200
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@...dia.com>, "Joel Fernandes"
<joelagnelf@...dia.com>, "Timur Tabi" <ttabi@...dia.com>, "Alistair Popple"
<apopple@...dia.com>, "David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, "Simona Vetter"
<simona@...ll.ch>, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>, "Miguel
Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun
Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin"
<lossin@...nel.org>, "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Alice
Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
<nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: pci: provide access to PCI Class,
subclass, implementation values
On Mon Aug 18, 2025 at 3:33 AM CEST, John Hubbard wrote:
> + /// Create a `Class` from the raw class code value, or `None` if the value doesn't
> + /// match any known class.
> + pub fn from_u32(value: u32) -> Option<Self> {
> + match value {
> + $(x if x == Self::$variant.0 => Some(Self::$variant),)+
> + _ => None,
> + }
> + }
Additional to the comments from Alex, I think one should be
`impl TryFrom<u32> for Class`.
> +
> + /// Create a new `pci::DeviceId` from a class number, mask, and specific vendor.
> + ///
> + /// This is more targeted than [`DeviceId::from_class`]: in addition to matching by Vendor, it
> + /// also matches the PCI Class (up to the entire 24 bits, depending on the mask).
> + pub const fn from_class_and_vendor(class: Class, class_mask: u32, vendor: u32) -> Self {
> + Self(bindings::pci_device_id {
> + vendor,
> + device: DeviceId::PCI_ANY_ID,
> + subvendor: DeviceId::PCI_ANY_ID,
> + subdevice: DeviceId::PCI_ANY_ID,
> + class: class.as_u32(),
> + class_mask,
> + driver_data: 0,
> + override_only: 0,
> + })
> + }
> }
>
> // SAFETY: `DeviceId` is a `#[repr(transparent)]` wrapper of `pci_device_id` and does not add
> @@ -410,6 +600,18 @@ pub fn resource_len(&self, bar: u32) -> Result<bindings::resource_size_t> {
> // - by its type invariant `self.as_raw` is always a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`.
> Ok(unsafe { bindings::pci_resource_len(self.as_raw(), bar.try_into()?) })
> }
> +
> + /// Returns the full 24-bit PCI class code as stored in hardware.
> + /// This includes base class, subclass, and programming interface.
> + pub fn class_code_raw(&self) -> u32 {
> + // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`.
> + unsafe { (*self.as_raw()).class }
> + }
> +
> + /// Returns the PCI class as a `Class` struct, or `None` if the class code is invalid.
> + pub fn class_enum(&self) -> Option<Class> {
> + Class::from_u32(self.class_code_raw())
> + }
I don't think we have struct pci_dev instances without a valid class code,
can we? Maybe we should convert infallibly here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists