[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKNmNmN7YX94CO0n@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 07:43:18 -1000
From: 'Tejun Heo' <tj@...nel.org>
To: liuwenfang <liuwenfang@...or.com>
Cc: 'David Vernet' <void@...ifault.com>, 'Andrea Righi' <arighi@...dia.com>,
'Changwoo Min' <changwoo@...lia.com>,
'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@...hat.com>,
'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>,
'Juri Lelli' <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
'Vincent Guittot' <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
'Dietmar Eggemann' <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
'Ben Segall' <bsegall@...gle.com>, 'Mel Gorman' <mgorman@...e.de>,
'Valentin Schneider' <vschneid@...hat.com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] sched_ext: Fix pnt_seq calculation
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 10:45:55AM +0000, liuwenfang wrote:
> +void scx_put_prev_set_next(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
> + struct task_struct *next)
Might as well match the surrounding naming convention and use
__put_prev_set_next_scx()
> Any suggestions will be appreciated and a formal patch will be sent out later.
Other than that, looks fine to me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists