linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aKNmo/O5aXb88GKK@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 10:45:07 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, "robin.murphy@....com"
	<robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "will@...nel.org"
	<will@...nel.org>, "robin.clark@....qualcomm.com"
	<robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, "yong.wu@...iatek.com"
	<yong.wu@...iatek.com>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "thierry.reding@...il.com"
	<thierry.reding@...il.com>, "vdumpa@...dia.com" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
	"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
	<rafael@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Liu, Yi L"
	<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
	<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
	<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, "Jaroszynski, Piotr" <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>,
	"Sethi, Vikram" <vsethi@...dia.com>, "helgaas@...nel.org"
	<helgaas@...nel.org>, "etzhao1900@...il.com" <etzhao1900@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 11:17:51AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 08:24:57AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 6:59 AM
> > > 
> > > The iommu_deferred_attach() is a runtime asynchronous function called by
> > > iommu-dma function, which could race against other attach functions if it
> > > accesses something in the dev->iommu_group.
> > 
> > Is there a real racing scenario being observed or more theoretical?
> 
> I think the commit message should explain the actual reason this is
> being done, which AFAICT because the new lockdeps added in following
> patches will fail on this path otherwise.

Hmm, I can mention that. But I think that's just a part of the
reason. It still doesn't seem correct to invoke an attach_dev
function without the lock since iommu_group_mutex_assert() may
be used in the path?

Thanks
Nicolin