[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DC5T752T3P8B.1UC57G2GH35Z5@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:43:42 -0500
From: Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: <vigneshr@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <d-gole@...com>,
<afd@...com>, <bb@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<detheridge@...com>, <matt.coster@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-j742s2: enable the
bxs-4-64
On Mon Aug 18, 2025 at 1:22 AM CDT, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed Aug 13, 2025 at 8:13 PM CEST, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 12:58-20250813, Randolph Sapp wrote:
>> > On Wed Aug 13, 2025 at 10:18 AM CDT, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> > > On 18:25-20250808, rs@...com wrote:
>> > >> From: Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>
>> > >>
>> > >> Add the relevant device tree node for Imagination's BXS-4-64 GPU.
>> > >>
>> > >> These devices uses a similar MSMC configuration to the J721S2. As such,
>> > >> they also require the use of the dma-coherent attribute.
>> > >>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>
>> > >> ---
>> > >> .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> > >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>> > >>
>> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
>> > >> index 7c5b0c69897d..a44ca34dda62 100644
>> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
>> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-j742s2-main-common.dtsi
>> > >> @@ -2691,4 +2691,18 @@ bist_main14: bist@...0000 {
>> > >> bootph-pre-ram;
>> > >> ti,sci-dev-id = <234>;
>> > >> };
>> > >> +
>> > >> + gpu: gpu@...0000000 {
>> > >> + compatible = "ti,j721s2-gpu", "img,img-bxs-4-64", "img,img-rogue";
>> > >
>> > > Following https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/DBE4UO2RGAYX.17V1DAF8MQYJM@kernel.org/
>> > > Is it worth having ti,j784s4-gpu here? Are there any SoC specific quirks
>> > > that driver will need to handle?
>> >
>> > No SoC specific quirks, aside from those already being tracked through the
>> > dma-coherent attribute. If we actually want to register SoC specific
>> > compatibility entries as advised by the kernel docs, just let me know. I've seen
>> > this opinion toggle a few times.
>> >
>>
>> Please provide bootlogs on linux-next with just this series applied.
>> IMHO, based on what I see at the moment on GPU, it might be a good idea
>> to have SoC specific compatibility entries.
>
> IMHO, that's *always* a good idea, even if the IP is the very same
> as the integration might be different.
>
> Apart from that, we now have two series which partly overlap.
> Should I repost mine, as that's more than just the DT entry? (Which
> doesn't work as is, I'd guess.)
>
> -michael
Ah, I don't see that series on the linux-arm-kernel list. If you can forward me
that I can work around whatever you've got.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists