linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABx5tq+yDZ2GL+ekvQAXHGXUbFF3KfwN5ts5020RpYFYZNcUzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:01:56 -0400
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_div for a mock divider

On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:40 AM Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com> wrote:
> +static long clk_dummy_div_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +                                    unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
> +       return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, parent_rate, NULL,
> +                                 CLK_DUMMY_DIV_WIDTH, CLK_DUMMY_DIV_FLAGS);
> +}

I sent the wrong version of this patch with the round_rate instead of
the determine_rate implementation. Kind of ironic given that I posted
various series across the kernel to get rid of round_rate!

Brian