[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72704edf-7b6d-4953-8d78-c998362acd0e@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:50:11 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...cr.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, Juergen Gross
<jgross@...e.de>, Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Joao Martins
<joao.m.martins@...cle.com>, Lorenzo Sccakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Gwan-gyeong Mun
<gwan-gyeong.mun@...el.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K . V"
<aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, Anshuman Khandual
<anshuman.khandual@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 mm-hotfixes 0/3] mm, x86: fix crash due to missing page
table sync and make it harder to miss
On 18.08.25 04:02, Harry Yoo wrote:
> To x86 folks:
> It's not clear whether this should go through the MM tree or the x86
> tree as it changes both. We could send it to the MM tree with Acks
> from the x86 folks, or we could send it through the x86 tree instead.
> What do you think?
I think this should go through the MM tree with ACKs on the x86 parts
from respective maintainers.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists