linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] pinctrl-scmi: Add GPIO support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdapzTTJhAvY1BL8GnUpCc_iHESbY9bFsNTE4Z6FjusiJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:03:43 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, 
	arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, 
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] pinctrl-scmi: Add GPIO support

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 9:38 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:

> This is version 2 of the RFC.  The main reason I'm sending this is because
> there was a bug in the first version where it didn't calculate the offset
> correctly so pins and groups weren't linked correctly.

I'm thinking of applying patches 4, 5 and 7 of this patch set to get
some movement in the code upstream and make less work for you
to rebase the thing, would this be OK?

Yours,
Linus Walleij