linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH next] regulator: rt5133: Fix IS_ERR() vs NULL bug in rt5133_validate_vendor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50e34f5e-410e-4a5c-a1de-34becd9056da@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 13:12:05 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Jeff Chang <jeff_chang@...htek.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] regulator: rt5133: Fix IS_ERR() vs NULL bug in
 rt5133_validate_vendor_info()

On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 09:49:46AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "priv->cdata" pointer isn't an error pointer, it should be a NULL
> check instead.  Otherwise it leads to a NULL pointer dereference in the
> caller, rt5133_probe().

This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)