[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKRyVwfwnn5_MuB4@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 12:47:19 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] rust: maple_tree: add MAINTAINERS entry
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue Aug 19, 2025 at 12:34 PM CEST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > Similar to and just below the existing MAPLE TREE entry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > Liam: I'm not sure what you prefer for the MAINTAINERS entry, so let me
> > know if you want anything changed. There are also a few other options,
> > for example, I could just add the files under the existing MAPLE TREE
> > entry? The get_maintainers script should still send any relevant patches
> > my way because they also match the RUST entry that has a wildcard on the
> > rust/ directory.
>
> From v1 [1]:
>
> >> We should have another section for the maple tree, since it's not just
> >> used for mm. Your stated plan is to use it for GPU allocations and the
> >> code doesn't live in mm/, wdyt?
>
> > Sure, I can add a new section if you prefer that.
>
> Maple tree is already used outside of mm, e.g. for regmap stuff and I also use
> it in nouveau. Hence, I read this as moving maple tree to e.g. lib/ adjusting
> the existing entry.
It's already in lib/ ?
> I personally think that - of course unless the affected people prefer otherwise
> - it is usually best to keep a single maintainers entry for the C and the Rust
> code. Maybe Alice can simply be added to the existing maintainers entry?
>
> What do you think?
That works for me too.
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists