lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250819073558.2c996b6d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 07:35:58 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Meghana Malladi <m-malladi@...com>
Cc: <namcao@...utronix.de>, <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
 <christian.koenig@....com>, <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, <sdf@...ichev.me>,
 <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <hawk@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 <ast@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 <davem@...emloft.net>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
 <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <srk@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra
 <vigneshr@...com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, <danishanwar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add AF_XDP zero
 copy for RX

On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:54:23 +0530 Meghana Malladi wrote:
> @@ -1332,6 +1350,13 @@ static int prueth_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *ndev, u32 qid, u32 flags)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (flags & XDP_WAKEUP_RX) {
> +		if (!napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&emac->napi_rx)) {
> +			if (likely(napi_schedule_prep(&emac->napi_rx)))
> +				__napi_schedule(&emac->napi_rx);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;

I suspect this series is generated against old source or there's
another conflicting series in flight, because git ends up applying
this chunk to prueth_xsk_pool_disable() :S

Before you proceed with AF_XDP could you make this driver build under
COMPILE_TEST on x86? This is very easy to miss, luckily we got an off
list report but its pure luck. And obviously much more effort for the
maintainers to investigate than if it was caught by the CI.
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ