[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <t5j22g5mqunygoj2qcggle5opzi53lofwjd2xen6pfwmd3dwa2@gipoxf3u377e>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:37:30 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5: Avoid handling handover twice
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 05:05:13PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 02:41:55PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 01:08:03PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > > A remoteproc could theoretically signal handover twice. This is unexpected
> >
> > theoretically or practically?
> >
>
> You could easily trigger handover again from a custom remoteproc
> firmware by setting the handover state to 0 and then back to 1. However,
> if you find a firmware version doing this, you might want to have a
> serious conversation with the firmware developer. It makes no sense to
> do that. :-)
>
> In other words, on technical level it is practical. From a conceptual
> point of view it is just theoretical.
>
> In any case, if it happens, we shouldn't mess up reference counters in
> my opinion (or risk dereferencing invalid pointers etc).
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists