lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <175563283711.270234.11714933416308258371.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:47:17 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, 
 Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, 
 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: consumer.rst: document bulk operations

On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 12:25:43 +0800, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The current consumer documentation does not include bulk operations,
> providing an example of how to acquire multiple regulators by calling
> regulator_get() multiple times. That solution is valid and slightly
> simpler for a small amount of regulators, but it does not scale well.
> 
> Document the bulk operations to get, enable and disable regulators.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: consumer.rst: document bulk operations
      commit: ec0be3cdf40b5302248f3fb27a911cc630e8b855

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ