lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025081916-screeching-tench-c9cefd@boujee-and-buff>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:44:02 -0400
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Hepp <andrew.hepp@...pp.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] iio: mcp9600: Features and improvements

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 07:24:55PM -0500, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:55:44 +0200
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 02:32:08PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > From: Ben Collins <bcollins@...ter.com>
> > > 
> > > ChangeLog:
> > > v5 -> v6:
> > >   - Fix accidental typo added in dt-bindings: IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISIN
> > >   - Correct some constraints in dt-bindings
> > >   - Reverse if/then for mcp9601 vs mcp9600 constraints in dt-bindings
> > >   - Updates to changelog for patch 2/6 (dt-bindings mcp9600)
> > >   - Cleanup tabs that were converted to spaces
> > >   - Split thermocouple-type default to separate patch  
> > 
> > Please start using b4, so you will get changelogs with lore links for
> > free and ALL your patches will be properly versioned. git can do that
> > as well - git format-patch -v5 --cover-letter, if you don't want to use
> > b4.
> 
> Second that.  This is what it looks like in patchwork that I use
> for managing reviews / merges etc.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-iio/list/?series=992678
> 
> version number not easy to find as it gets dropped from the series title
> and is only normally listed for the patches. 

I appreciate both of you suggesting this. I've switched to b4 now and
now I don't know how anyone could not use it.

-- 
 Ben Collins
 https://libjwt.io
 https://github.com/benmcollins
 --
 3EC9 7598 1672 961A 1139  173A 5D5A 57C7 242B 22CF

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ