[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250819155913.93e549fc5bd728c2f9ddacf4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:59:13 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: jane.chu@...cle.com, lirongqing <lirongqing@...du.com>,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, osalvador@...e.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] mm/hugetlb: early exit from
hugetlb_pages_alloc_boot() when max_huge_pages=0
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:46:59 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>> if (hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_specific_nodes(h))
> >>> return;
> >>
> >> Looks good. Could you add stable: ?
>
> Can you elaborate why you think this is stable material?
>
To prevent the
> [ 3.702280] HugeTLB: allocation took 0ms with hugepage_allocation_threads=32
message when hugetlb pages are disabled.
Yeah, I guess it isn't very important. I'll destabilize the patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists