linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH next] smb: client: Fix NULL vs ERR_PTR() returns in cifs_get_tcon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aKQLNODuSBvUP4_F@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:27:16 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc: Wang Zhaolong <wangzhaolong@...weicloud.com>,
	Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.org>,
	Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>,
	Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
	Bharath SM <bharathsm@...rosoft.com>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
	samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] smb: client: Fix NULL vs ERR_PTR() returns in
 cifs_get_tcon_super()

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 04:41:52PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> Since Paulo pointed out a problem with v4 of this patch, an obvious
> question is Dan's patch "independent enough" to take or would it make
> the v5 of your patch harder.  Let me know when there is a v5 of the
> patch so we can do more testing and review
> 

Probably it's best to just fix this in version 5 instead of sending a
separate fix patch.

regards,
dan carpenter