linux-kernel - RE: [RESEND v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Don't poll L2 if QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <AS8PR04MB88338A64A256C92CE64A02018C30A@AS8PR04MB8833.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:51:41 +0000
From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>, "jingoohan1@...il.com"
	<jingoohan1@...il.com>, "l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, "kwilczynski@...nel.org"
	<kwilczynski@...nel.org>, "mani@...nel.org" <mani@...nel.org>,
	"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com"
	<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "kernel@...gutronix.de"
	<kernel@...gutronix.de>, "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev"
	<imx@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RESEND v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Don't poll L2 if QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM
 is existing in suspend

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> Sent: 2025年8月18日 23:49
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> Cc: Frank Li <frank.li@....com>; jingoohan1@...il.com;
> l.stach@...gutronix.de; lpieralisi@...nel.org; kwilczynski@...nel.org;
> mani@...nel.org; robh@...nel.org; bhelgaas@...gle.com;
> shawnguo@...nel.org; s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> festevam@...il.com; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; imx@...ts.linux.dev;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RESEND v3 1/5] PCI: dwc: Don't poll L2 if
> QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM is existing in suspend
> 
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > Refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.2, fig 5-1 Link Power Management State Flow
> > Diagram. Both L0 and L2/L3 Ready can be transferred to LDn directly.
> >
> > It's harmless to let dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() proceed suspend after the
> > PME_Turn_Off is sent out, whatever the LTSSM state is in L2 or L3
> > after a recommended 10ms max wait refer to PCIe r6.0, sec 5.3.3.2.1
> > PME Synchronization.
> >
> > The LTSSM states are inaccessible on i.MX6QP and i.MX7D after the
> > PME_Turn_Off is sent out.
> >
> > To support this case, don't poll L2 state and apply a simple delay of
> > PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US(10ms) if the QUIRK_NOL2POLL_IN_PM flag
> is
> > set in suspend.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > ---
> >  .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 31
> > +++++++++++++------  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h  |
> > 4 +++
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > index 952f8594b5012..20a7f827babbf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > {
> >  	u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> >  	u32 val;
> > -	int ret;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> >
> >       /*
> >        * If L1SS is supported, then do not put the link into L2 as
> > some
>          * devices such as NVMe expect low resume latency.
>          */
>          if (dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL) &
> PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1)
>                 return 0;
> 
> You didn't change it in this patch (the L1SS test was added by
> 4774faf854f5 ("PCI: dwc: Implement generic suspend/resume functionality")),
> but this L1SS check is an encapsulation problem.
> The ASPM configuration shouldn't leak out here in such an ad hoc way.
Hi Bjorn:
Thanks for your comments.
Should I created another commit to get ride of the L1SS check codes?
> 
> *All* drivers, not just NVMe, would prefer low resume latency.
> 
> How do we deal with this in other host controller drivers?  If any other
> driver puts links in L2, I suppose they would have the same issue?  Maybe
> DWC is the only one that puts the link in L2?
> 
> What happens when we add a new driver that puts links in L2?  I guess
> we'll be debugging some NVMe issue again?
Up to now, this is the first one routine to do the L1SS check in L2 entry.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> 
> Bjorn