[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D49B33DEEB859CD5+aKQltEZ8Ef3v6rB9@LT-Guozexi>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:20:20 +0800
From: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@...ux.spacemit.com>
To: Jimmy Ho <jimmy.ho@...ive.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: troy.mitchell@...ux.spacemit.com, ziyao@...root.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
alex@...ti.fr, cyrilbur@...storrent.com, cleger@...osinc.com,
charlie@...osinc.com, kees@...nel.org, ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk,
jszhang@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: fix using wrong load type
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 03:19:17PM +0800, Troy Mitchell wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 03:13:18PM +0800, Jimmy Ho wrote:
> > thread_info.cpu field is 32 bits wide,
> > but is accessed using an XLEN-bit load, which might be 64bit load, fix it
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - replace space with tab to keep it aligned with code block
> > - Add "Fixes" tag
> Please add previous version link.
>
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - add a comment to explain why use lw instead of REG_L.
> > - correct commit message
> ditto.
>
> Additionally, I see a patch here that serves the same purpose as yours,
Sry I forgot to put link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250722160556.2216925-4-rkrcmar@ventanamicro.com/
- Troy
> but it's more comprehensive and was submitted earlier.
>
> In any case, if you'd like to proceed, here is the:
> Acked-by: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@...ux.spacemit.com>
> >
> > Fixes: 503638e0babf3 ("riscv: Stop emitting preventive sfence.vma for new vmalloc mappings")
> > Signed-off-by: Jimmy Ho <jimmy.ho@...ive.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > index 3a0ec6fd5956..492ae936dccd 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> > @@ -45,8 +45,10 @@
> > * Computes:
> > * a0 = &new_vmalloc[BIT_WORD(cpu)]
> > * a1 = BIT_MASK(cpu)
> > + *
> > + * using lw instead of REG_L is because the thread_info.cpu field is 32 bits wide
> > */
> > - REG_L a2, TASK_TI_CPU(tp)
> > + lw a2, TASK_TI_CPU(tp)
> > /*
> > * Compute the new_vmalloc element position:
> > * (cpu / 64) * 8 = (cpu >> 6) << 3
> > --
> > 2.39.3
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists