[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1131ae6ff2834b57b71f0e41879bc83c@honor.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 07:36:59 +0000
From: liuwenfang <liuwenfang@...or.com>
To: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: 'Tejun Heo' <tj@...nel.org>, 'David Vernet' <void@...ifault.com>, "'Andrea
Righi'" <arighi@...dia.com>, 'Changwoo Min' <changwoo@...lia.com>, "'Ingo
Molnar'" <mingo@...hat.com>, 'Juri Lelli' <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, "'Vincent
Guittot'" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, 'Dietmar Eggemann'
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, 'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@...dmis.org>, "'Ben
Segall'" <bsegall@...gle.com>, 'Mel Gorman' <mgorman@...e.de>, "'Valentin
Schneider'" <vschneid@...hat.com>, "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/3] sched_ext: Fix pnt_seq calculation
Hello,
> This doesn't even begin to be an adequate changelog.
>
> And please, don't put an out of line function call in put_prev_set_next_task(.
A changelog has been added accordingly in [PATCH v4 1/3], and __put_prev_set_next_scx() has been changed to an inline function.
However, switch_class() called in __put_prev_set_next_scx() is difficult to convert into an inline function in [PATCH v4 2/3].
look forward for your reply.
--
Regards.
Wenfang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists