[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PUZPR04MB6316487B10F6F2F62C0249598130A@PUZPR04MB6316.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 01:20:47 +0000
From: "Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com" <Yuezhang.Mo@...y.com>
To: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao@...o.com>,
"linkinjeon@...nel.org"
<linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
"sj1557.seo@...sung.com" <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
CC: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exfat: drop redundant conversion to bool
> The result of integer comparison already evaluates to bool. No need for
> explicit conversion.
>
> No functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xichao Zhao <zhao.xichao@...o.com>
> ---
> fs/exfat/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/inode.c b/fs/exfat/inode.c
> index c10844e1e16c..f9501c3a3666 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/inode.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int __exfat_write_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
> struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
> struct exfat_inode_info *ei = EXFAT_I(inode);
> - bool is_dir = (ei->type == TYPE_DIR) ? true : false;
> + bool is_dir = (ei->type == TYPE_DIR);
> struct timespec64 ts;
>
> if (inode->i_ino == EXFAT_ROOT_INO)
The following two if statements both check whether the directory is the root.
Can we remove the second if statement? I don't know its background.
if (inode->i_ino == EXFAT_ROOT_INO)
return 0;
if (is_dir && ei->dir.dir == sbi->root_dir && ei->entry == -1)
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists