lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250819080358.H9R_64I7@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:03:58 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Documentation: Add real-time to core-api

On 2025-08-18 10:16:41 [-0600], Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> writes:
> 
> One nit:
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst b/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..50d994a31e11c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/real-time/differences.rst
> > @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
> > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +========================
> > +Significant differences
> > +========================
> 
> That heading text will appear in various places, including in the
> rendering of your new index.rst file.  In such a setting, "significant
> differences" doesn't give a lot of information.  Something like "How
> realtime kernels differ" would be better, IMO.
> 
> Otherwise, this all looks good to me.  Did you want me to pick it up, or
> did you have another path in mind for this work?

Right now this is it. Do you update the text above as suggested or do
you want me to resend it?

> Thanks,
> 
> jon

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ