[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250819093424.1011645-5-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 17:34:21 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: ast@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: frederic@...nel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org,
joelagnelf@...dia.com,
josh@...htriplett.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
urezki@...il.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com,
qiang.zhang@...ux.dev,
daniel@...earbox.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/7] bpf: use rcu_read_lock_dont_migrate() for bpf_iter_run_prog()
Use rcu_read_lock_dont_migrate() and rcu_read_unlock_migrate() in
bpf_iter_run_prog to obtain better performance when PREEMPT_RCU is
not enabled.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@...natelecom.cn>
---
v2:
- use rcu_read_lock_dont_migrate() instead of rcu_migrate_disable()
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
index 0cbcae727079..6ac35430c573 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -705,13 +705,11 @@ int bpf_iter_run_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx)
migrate_enable();
rcu_read_unlock_trace();
} else {
- rcu_read_lock();
- migrate_disable();
+ rcu_read_lock_dont_migrate();
old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx);
ret = bpf_prog_run(prog, ctx);
bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
- migrate_enable();
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ rcu_read_unlock_migrate();
}
/* bpf program can only return 0 or 1:
--
2.50.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists