[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeTL7mJ-Ttgpkjd5A04DgHqkkPY90LtJriQjoaUZ0TbhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:18:35 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com>, Song Qiang <songqiang1304521@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] io: proximity: vl53l0x-i2c: Fix error code in probe()
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:39 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Commit 65e8202f0322 ("iio: Remove error prints for
> devm_add_action_or_reset()") accidentally introduce a bug where we
introduced
> returned "ret" but the error code was stored in "error" if
> devm_add_action_or_reset() failed. Using two variables to store error
> codes is unnecessary and confusing. Delete the "error" variable and use
> "ret" everywhere instead.
Agree, this is a good catch!
But please, fix the Subject to start with "iio:".
With the above comments being addressed
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists