[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250819103940.342774-1-zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:39:38 +0800
From: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
To: "rafael J . wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: zhenglifeng <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: minor cleanups around policy parsing and API
This series contains two small cpufreq cleanups:
1) Use strlen() as the length argument for strncasecmp() in
cpufreq_parse_policy(). This makes comparison more permissive
(prefix match), which is consistent with the intention in our
deployment and improves readability over using CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN.
2) Drop the redundant `new_pol` parameter from cpufreq_set_policy().
Only drivers that implement ->setpolicy would ever care about
policy values, and passing `new_pol` around is unnecessary.
Callers now pass just the policy and (where applicable) the
governor pointer; drivers can read policy->policy directly.
No functional regressions are expected for drivers which do not
implement ->setpolicy (e.g. acpi-cpufreq), as they ignore policy
values anyway.
Zihuan Zhang (2):
cpufreq: use strlen() for governor name comparison
cpufreq: simplify cpufreq_set_policy() interface
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists