lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025081957-promotion-shrivel-32cc@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:28:40 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] sysfs: attribute_group: enable const variants of
 is_visible()

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 11:14:30AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> When constifying instances of struct attribute, for consistency the
> corresponding .is_visible() callback should be adapted, too.
> Introduce a temporary transition mechanism until all callbacks are
> converted.

I count about 600+ users of is_visible() now, how is that going to be
converted?  It feels like a lot of churn/work, what's the plan here?

These changes seem a lot more intrusive than the bin_attr ones :(

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ