[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250819202715.6f1cf0d6@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:27:15 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Trace Kernel <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Tianrui Zhao
<zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: KVM: Move kvm_iocsr tracepoint out of
generic code
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 19:56:42 +0800
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 9:51 AM Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2025/7/24 上午9:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 09:39:40 +0800
> > > Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn> wrote:
> > >
> > >>> #define kvm_fpu_load_symbol \
> > >>> {0, "unload"}, \
> > >>> {1, "load"}
> > >>>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Should this go through the loongarch tree or should I take it?
> > Huacai,
> >
> > What is your point about this?
> I will take it, thanks.
>
> Huacai
Did this fall through the cracks?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists