[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175572868343.1564032.6590237767039466297.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 17:24:45 -0500
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: dt: writing-bindings: Document node name ABI and
simple-mfd
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:25:35 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Document established Devicetree bindings maintainers review practice:
>
> 1. Device node names should not be treated as an ABI, unless for
> children of a device when documented.
> There were many patches posted using of_find_node_by_name() or
> of_node_name_eq() for accessing siblings or completely different
> nodes. These cases were introducing undocumented ABI, so they are
> discouraged.
>
> 2. 'simple-mfd' means children do not depend on parent device resources.
> 'simple-bus' is so simple, that even 'reg' properties are not
> applicable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists