linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250821091548.4925bd63@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:15:48 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:05:59 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the vfs-brauner tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/iomap/direct-io.c: In function 'iomap_dio_zero':
> fs/iomap/direct-io.c:281:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'largest_zero_folio'; did you mean 'is_zero_folio'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   281 |         struct folio *zero_folio = largest_zero_folio();
>       |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                    is_zero_folio
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   5589673e8d8d ("iomap: use largest_zero_folio() in iomap_dio_zero()")
> 
> I have used the vfs-brauner tree from next-20250815 for today.

I have, instead, reverted the above commit in the merge of the
vfs-brauner tree from today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped