[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0f7f062-dd12-4aba-a1af-5626746059f0@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 06:34:42 +0100
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, André Draszik
<andre.draszik@...aro.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: dts: exynos: gs101: add cpufreq support
On 8/19/25 4:22 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/' for 20250819-acpm-dvfs-dt-v1-0-4e38b95408c4@...aro.org:
>
> Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi:75.32-33 Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi:75.32-33 syntax errorsyntax error
Thanks, Rob.
I should have been more explicit in the cover letter. It fails because it depends
on the clock definitions that are introduced with the bindings in:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20250819-acpm-clk-v1-0-6bbd97474671@linaro.org/T/#me3cbe2a97485d19eaf505ad23202f20a21305dd8
I chose to have the bindings with the driver patches as the clock definitions
are needed in the clock driver as well.
Krzysztof, please let me know if there's a preference on how to deal with such
dependencies, I'll note it down and respin if needed.
Thanks,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists