[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC_iWjLzxfSXMAuQe87f4LE=yqQ60ddZ9WX94fagzbcepscLjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:44:15 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] efi: stmm: Drop unneeded null pointer check
Hi Jan
On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 at 22:12, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>
> The API documenation of setup_mm_hdr does not mention that dptr can be
> NULL, this is a local function, and no caller passes NULL. So drop the
> unneeded check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c
> index bf992b42be70..ff41667b1005 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c
> @@ -191,8 +191,7 @@ static void *setup_mm_hdr(u8 **dptr, size_t *nr_pages, size_t payload_size,
>
> var_hdr = (struct smm_variable_communicate_header *)mm_hdr->data;
> var_hdr->function = func;
> - if (dptr)
> - *dptr = comm_buf;
> + *dptr = comm_buf;
I think this is ok, eventually tee_mm_communicate() will check for a
NULL ptr and return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
> *ret = EFI_SUCCESS;
>
> return var_hdr->data;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists