[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbwUU5TmeVhcSAZ_ZaFa5nGVtyFBjNXBwNMC5y38heELA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:26:34 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, ardb@...nel.org, ebiggers@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org,
dave@...ilevsky.ca, ruanjinjie@...wei.com, liuyuntao12@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...gfor.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ftrace: Implement HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS
Unsolicited thread intervention:
Richard if you use ftrace on ARM a lot, have you looked into
patchable function entry as described by Mark Rutland for
ARM64 in this talk?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9cqUTF4I0w
(Described at 19:12 into the talk.)
I think it would be neat if we could do this on ARM32 as well
but I do not know how hard it would be.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists