[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c669a58-1741-4b22-8fa5-752501a6e128@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:30:57 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: 高翔 <gaoxiang17@...omi.com>,
Xiang Gao <gxxa03070307@...il.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com" <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>, "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"surenb@...gle.com" <surenb@...gle.com>, "mhocko@...e.com"
<mhocko@...e.com>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [External Mail]Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm/cma: add 'available count' and 'total count' to trace_cma_alloc_start
On 20.08.25 11:27, 高翔 wrote:
> Is "request count" also written in the title? The previous "count" was
> changed to "request_count"
Right, "cma->available_count" gets translated to "request_count". Maybe
that's the issue here?
PLEASE
Can you (Xiang Gao) test the patch before sending it?
Nobody has the capacity here to go through 20 iterations of such a
trivial change.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists