[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ffb7fa5-641b-47b7-963c-480c8494c85c@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:29:37 +0200
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>, <chessman@....org>
CC: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethernet: tlan: Convert to use jiffies macro
On 8/19/25 10:16, zhang.enpei@....com.cn wrote:
> From: Zhang Enpei <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>
>
> Use time_after_eq macro instead of using jiffies directly to handle
> wraparound.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Enpei <zhang.enpei@....com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/tlan.c | 4 +---
change looks good, and it seems that there is no more candidates in ti/
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/tlan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/tlan.c
> index a55b0f951181..78e439834f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/tlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/tlan.c
> @@ -1817,7 +1817,6 @@ static void tlan_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> {
> struct tlan_priv *priv = timer_container_of(priv, t, timer);
> struct net_device *dev = priv->dev;
> - u32 elapsed;
> unsigned long flags = 0;
>
> priv->timer.function = NULL;
> @@ -1844,8 +1843,7 @@ static void tlan_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> case TLAN_TIMER_ACTIVITY:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> if (priv->timer.function == NULL) {
> - elapsed = jiffies - priv->timer_set_at;
> - if (elapsed >= TLAN_TIMER_ACT_DELAY) {
> + if (time_after_eq(jiffies, priv->timer_set_at + TLAN_TIMER_ACT_DELAY)) {
> tlan_dio_write8(dev->base_addr,
> TLAN_LED_REG, TLAN_LED_LINK);
> } else {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists