[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175568274935.1420.12939640357922910856.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:39:09 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/core] x86/hyperv: Use direct call to hypercall-page
The following commit has been merged into the x86/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: c8ed0812646e1335c80a8f204c1b92b2f9d76119
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c8ed0812646e1335c80a8f204c1b92b2f9d76119
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:55:55 +02:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:23:07 +02:00
x86/hyperv: Use direct call to hypercall-page
Instead of using an indirect call to the hypercall page, use a direct
call instead. This avoids all CFI problems, including the one where
the hypercall page doesn't have IBT on.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250714103441.011387946@infradead.org
---
arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
index 5ef1e64..e890fd3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
#include <asm/desc.h>
#include <asm/e820/api.h>
#include <asm/sev.h>
-#include <asm/ibt.h>
#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
#include <hyperv/hvhdk.h>
#include <asm/mshyperv.h>
@@ -39,23 +38,41 @@
void *hv_hypercall_pg;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+static u64 __hv_hyperfail(u64 control, u64 param1, u64 param2)
+{
+ return U64_MAX;
+}
+
+DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(__hv_hypercall, __hv_hyperfail);
+
u64 hv_std_hypercall(u64 control, u64 param1, u64 param2)
{
u64 hv_status;
- if (!hv_hypercall_pg)
- return U64_MAX;
-
register u64 __r8 asm("r8") = param2;
- asm volatile (CALL_NOSPEC
+ asm volatile ("call " STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_STR(__hv_hypercall)
: "=a" (hv_status), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT,
"+c" (control), "+d" (param1), "+r" (__r8)
- : THUNK_TARGET(hv_hypercall_pg)
- : "cc", "memory", "r9", "r10", "r11");
+ : : "cc", "memory", "r9", "r10", "r11");
return hv_status;
}
+
+typedef u64 (*hv_hypercall_f)(u64 control, u64 param1, u64 param2);
+
+static inline void hv_set_hypercall_pg(void *ptr)
+{
+ hv_hypercall_pg = ptr;
+
+ if (!ptr)
+ ptr = &__hv_hyperfail;
+ static_call_update(__hv_hypercall, (hv_hypercall_f)ptr);
+}
#else
+static inline void hv_set_hypercall_pg(void *ptr)
+{
+ hv_hypercall_pg = ptr;
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_hypercall_pg);
#endif
@@ -350,7 +367,7 @@ static int hv_suspend(void)
* pointer is restored on resume.
*/
hv_hypercall_pg_saved = hv_hypercall_pg;
- hv_hypercall_pg = NULL;
+ hv_set_hypercall_pg(NULL);
/* Disable the hypercall page in the hypervisor */
rdmsrq(HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL, hypercall_msr.as_uint64);
@@ -376,7 +393,7 @@ static void hv_resume(void)
vmalloc_to_pfn(hv_hypercall_pg_saved);
wrmsrq(HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL, hypercall_msr.as_uint64);
- hv_hypercall_pg = hv_hypercall_pg_saved;
+ hv_set_hypercall_pg(hv_hypercall_pg_saved);
hv_hypercall_pg_saved = NULL;
/*
@@ -496,8 +513,8 @@ void __init hyperv_init(void)
if (hv_isolation_type_tdx() && !ms_hyperv.paravisor_present)
goto skip_hypercall_pg_init;
- hv_hypercall_pg = __vmalloc_node_range(PAGE_SIZE, 1, VMALLOC_START,
- VMALLOC_END, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_ROX,
+ hv_hypercall_pg = __vmalloc_node_range(PAGE_SIZE, 1, MODULES_VADDR,
+ MODULES_END, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_ROX,
VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, NUMA_NO_NODE,
__builtin_return_address(0));
if (hv_hypercall_pg == NULL)
@@ -535,27 +552,9 @@ void __init hyperv_init(void)
wrmsrq(HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL, hypercall_msr.as_uint64);
}
-skip_hypercall_pg_init:
- /*
- * Some versions of Hyper-V that provide IBT in guest VMs have a bug
- * in that there's no ENDBR64 instruction at the entry to the
- * hypercall page. Because hypercalls are invoked via an indirect call
- * to the hypercall page, all hypercall attempts fail when IBT is
- * enabled, and Linux panics. For such buggy versions, disable IBT.
- *
- * Fixed versions of Hyper-V always provide ENDBR64 on the hypercall
- * page, so if future Linux kernel versions enable IBT for 32-bit
- * builds, additional hypercall page hackery will be required here
- * to provide an ENDBR32.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT
- if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_IBT) &&
- *(u32 *)hv_hypercall_pg != gen_endbr()) {
- setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBT);
- pr_warn("Disabling IBT because of Hyper-V bug\n");
- }
-#endif
+ hv_set_hypercall_pg(hv_hypercall_pg);
+skip_hypercall_pg_init:
/*
* hyperv_init() is called before LAPIC is initialized: see
* apic_intr_mode_init() -> x86_platform.apic_post_init() and
Powered by blists - more mailing lists