[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250820112144.43714c90@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:21:44 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>, Danilo Krummrich
<dakr@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, DRI
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Intel Graphics
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs
between commit:
db2e7bcee11c ("drm: nova-drm: fix 32-bit arm build")
from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
94febfb5bcfb ("rust: drm: Drop the use of Opaque for ioctl arguments")
from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs
index 4fe62cf98a23,7e7d4e2de2fb..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs
@@@ -39,8 -36,7 +36,8 @@@ impl File
_ => return Err(EINVAL),
};
- getparam.value = value;
+ #[allow(clippy::useless_conversion)]
- getparam.set_value(value.into());
++ getparam.value = value.into();
Ok(0)
}
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists