lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250820013452.495481-1-marcos@orca.pet>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 03:34:46 +0200
From: Marcos Del Sol Vives <marcos@...a.pet>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: marcos@...a.pet,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>,
	Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: add hintable NOPs emulation

Hintable NOPs are a series of instructions introduced by Intel with the
Pentium Pro (i686), and described in US patent US5701442A.

These instructions were reserved to allow backwards-compatible changes
in the instruction set possible, by having old processors treat them as
variable-length NOPs, while having other semantics in modern processors.

Some modern uses are:
 - Multi-byte/long NOPs
 - Indirect Branch Tracking (ENDBR32)
 - Shadow Stack (part of CET)

Some processors advertising i686 compatibility lack full support for
them, which may cause #UD to be incorrectly triggered, crashing software
that uses then with an unexpected SIGILL.

One such software is sudo in Debian bookworm, which is compiled with
GCC -fcf-protection=branch and contains ENDBR32 instructions. It crashes
on my Vortex86DX3 processor and VIA C3 Nehalem processors [1].

This patch is a much simplified version of my previous patch for x86
instruction emulation [2], that only emulates hintable NOPs.

When #UD is raised, it checks if the opcode corresponds to a hintable NOP
in user space. If true, it warns the user via the dmesg and advances the
instruction pointer, thus emulating its expected NOP behaviour.

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/10/msg00118.html
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210626130313.1283485-1-marcos@orca.pet/

Signed-off-by: Marcos Del Sol Vives <marcos@...a.pet>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig                 | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |  4 ++++
 arch/x86/kernel/process.c        |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c          | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 58d890fe2100..a6daebdc2573 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1286,6 +1286,35 @@ config X86_IOPL_IOPERM
 	  ability to disable interrupts from user space which would be
 	  granted if the hardware IOPL mechanism would be used.
 
+config X86_HNOP_EMU
+	bool "Hintable NOPs emulation"
+	depends on X86_32
+	default y
+	help
+	  Hintable NOPs are a series of instructions introduced by Intel with
+	  the Pentium Pro (i686), and described in US patent US5701442A.
+
+	  These instructions were reserved to allow backwards-compatible
+	  changes in the instruction set possible, by having old processors
+	  treat them as variable-length NOPs, while having other semantics in
+	  modern processors.
+
+	  Some modern uses are:
+	   - Multi-byte/long NOPs
+	   - Indirect Branch Tracking (ENDBR32)
+	   - Shadow Stack (part of CET)
+
+	  Some processors advertising i686 compatibility (such as Cyrix MII,
+	  VIA C3 Nehalem or DM&P Vortex86DX3) lack full support for them,
+	  which may cause SIGILL to be incorrectly raised in user space when
+	  a hintable NOP is encountered.
+
+	  Say Y here if you want the kernel to emulate them, allowing programs
+	  that make use of them to run transparently on such processors.
+
+	  This emulation has no performance penalty for processors that
+	  properly support them, so if unsure, enable it.
+
 config TOSHIBA
 	tristate "Toshiba Laptop support"
 	depends on X86_32
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index bde58f6510ac..c34fb678c4de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -499,6 +499,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
 
 	unsigned int		iopl_warn:1;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HNOP_EMU
+	unsigned int		hnop_warn:1;
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * Protection Keys Register for Userspace.  Loaded immediately on
 	 * context switch. Store it in thread_struct to avoid a lookup in
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index 1b7960cf6eb0..6ec8021638d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -178,6 +178,9 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
 	p->thread.io_bitmap = NULL;
 	clear_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_IO_BITMAP);
 	p->thread.iopl_warn = 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HNOP_EMU
+	p->thread.hnop_warn = 0;
+#endif
 	memset(p->thread.ptrace_bps, 0, sizeof(p->thread.ptrace_bps));
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 36354b470590..2dcb7d7edf8a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -295,12 +295,48 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY(exc_overflow)
 	do_error_trap(regs, 0, "overflow", X86_TRAP_OF, SIGSEGV, 0, NULL);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HNOP_EMU
+static bool handle_hnop(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct thread_struct *t = &current->thread;
+	unsigned char buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
+	unsigned long nr_copied;
+	struct insn insn;
+
+	nr_copied = insn_fetch_from_user(regs, buf);
+	if (nr_copied <= 0)
+		return false;
+
+	if (!insn_decode_from_regs(&insn, regs, buf, nr_copied))
+		return false;
+
+	/* Hintable NOPs cover 0F 18 to 0F 1F */
+	if (insn.opcode.bytes[0] != 0x0F ||
+		insn.opcode.bytes[1] < 0x18 || insn.opcode.bytes[1] > 0x1F)
+		return false;
+
+	if (!t->hnop_warn) {
+		pr_warn_ratelimited("%s[%d] emulating hintable NOP, ip:%lx\n",
+		       current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), regs->ip);
+		t->hnop_warn = 1;
+	}
+
+	regs->ip += insn.length;
+	return true;
+}
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG
 void handle_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *regs)
 #else
 static inline void handle_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *regs)
 #endif
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HNOP_EMU
+	if (user_mode(regs) && handle_hnop(regs))
+		return;
+#endif
+
 	do_error_trap(regs, 0, "invalid opcode", X86_TRAP_UD, SIGILL,
 		      ILL_ILLOPN, error_get_trap_addr(regs));
 }
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ