[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKcMZ7vTYAOBWuha@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:09:21 +0200
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
To: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@...aro.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: iris: Fix firmware reference leak and unmap
memory after load
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 02:33:18PM +0530, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> I noticed that the maintainers were included in the CC list rather than the
> "To" field. please ensure that all relevant maintainers are added directly
> to the "To" list in your future submissions.
Yeah, I had a bit weird choice between To/Cc in this patch. I'll change
it for my patches in the future.
Note however that there isn't any convention given for To/Cc in the
process document [1]. It just says you should "copy the appropriate
subsystem maintainer(s)", so everyone does it a bit differently.
I would recommend to avoid relying on To vs Cc, to make sure you don't
accidentally miss submissions from others as well.
> Reviewed-by: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>
Thanks for the review!
Stephan
[1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists