[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250821144612.a26otz2yriqb5gdq@master>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:46:12 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, mic@...ikod.net,
gnoack@...gle.com, david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, ming.lei@...hat.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: centralise maybe-unused definition in
kselftest.h
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 03:41:59PM +0530, Bala-Vignesh-Reddy wrote:
>Several selftests subdirectories duplicated the define __maybe_unused,
>leading to redundant code. Moved to kselftest.h header and removed
>other definition.
>
>This addresses the duplication noted in the proc-pid-vm warning fix
>
>Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>Link:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250820143954.33d95635e504e94df01930d0@linux-foundation.org/
>
>Signed-off-by: Bala-Vignesh-Reddy <reddybalavignesh9979@...il.com>
Looks reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists