linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] genirq/test: Platform/architecture fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aKc8Cz4hgMoJ1v-C@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:32:27 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] genirq/test: Platform/architecture fixes

Hi Geert,

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 09:05:03AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> So probably the test should depend on SPARSE_IRQ?  Increasing NR_IRQS
> everywhere when IRQ_KUNIT_TEST is enabled sounds rather invasive to me.

Yeah, I was leaning to 'depends on SPARSE_IRQ'

> BTW, given the test calls irq_domain_alloc_descs(), I think it should
> also depend on IRQ_DOMAIN.

Right, that's in patch 1.

I'll resend the series with a 'depends on SPARSE_IRQ'.

Thanks,
Brian